Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD/COP/15/L.25) (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2022).
Decision Adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity 15/5. Monitoring framework for the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD/COP/DEC/15/5) (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2022).
Keith, D. A. et al. Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. PLoS ONE (2013).
Leadley, P. et al. Achieving global biodiversity goals by 2050 requires urgent and integrated actions. One Earth 5, 597–603 (2022).
Rowland, J. A. et al. Ecosystem indices to support global biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12680 (2020).
Nicholson, E. et al. Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal, milestones and indicators for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1338–1349 (2021).
Nature Risk Rising: Why the Crisis Engulfing Nature Matters for Business and the Economy (World Economic Forum, 2020).
Chaplin-Kramer, R. et al. Global modeling of nature’s contributions to people. Science 366, 255–258 (2019).
Brondizio, E. S et al. (eds) Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019).
Watson, J. E. M. et al. Set a global target for ecosystems. Nature 578, 360–362 (2020).
Keith, D. A. et al. A function-based typology for Earth’s ecosystems. Nature 610, 513–518 (2022).
Murray, N. J. et al. The role of satellite remote sensing in structured ecosystem risk assessments. Sci. Total Environ. 619–620, 249–257 (2018).
Edens, B. et al. Establishing the SEEA Ecosystem Accounting as a global standard. Ecosyst. Serv. 54, 101413 (2022).
Keith, D. A. et al. The IUCN Red List of Ecosystems: motivations, challenges and applications. Conserv. Lett. 8, 214–226 (2015).
Betts, J. et al. A framework for evaluating the impact of the IUCN Red List of threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 34, 632–643 (2020).
Brooks, T. M. et al. Analysing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to support regional environmental assessments. Sci. Data 3, 160007 (2016).
Raimondo, D. et al. Using Red List indices to monitor extinction risk at national scales. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 5, e12854 (2023).
Salomaa, A. & Arponen, A. The role of the Red Lists of Ecosystems in leveraging sustainability changes in Finland—perceptions of the assessors. Ecosyst. People 19, 2222185 (2023).
Botts, E. A. et al. More than just a (red) list: over a decade of using South Africa’s threatened ecosystems in policy and practice. Biol. Conserv. 246, 108559 (2020).
Bland, L. M. et al. Impacts of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems on conservation policy and practice. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12666 (2019).
Keith, D. A. et al. Contributions of Red Lists of Ecosystems to risk-based design and management of protected and conserved areas in Africa. Conserv. Biol., (2023).
Brooks, T. M. et al. Harnessing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to track the Aichi targets and Sustainable Development Goals. Biodiversity 16, 157–174 (2015).
Lequiller, F. & Blades, D. Understanding National Accounts (OECD, 2014).
Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) Recommendations v.1.0, (TNFD, 2023).
IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria v.3.1 (IUCN, 2001).
Guidelines for Using a Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas v.1.2 (IUCN, 2022).
A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Areas v.1.0, 1st edn (IUCN, 2016).
Murray, N. J. et al. Myanmar’s terrestrial ecosystems: status, threats and conservation opportunities. Biol. Conserv. 252, 108834 (2020).
Nicholson, E. et al. Towards consistency, rigour and compatibility of risk assessments for ecosystems and ecological communities. Austral Ecol. 40, 347–363 (2015).
Nicholson, E., Keith, D. A. & Wilcove, D. S. Assessing the threat status of ecological communities. Conserv. Biol. 23, 259–274 (2009).
Alaniz, A. J., Pérez-Quezada, J. F., Galleguillos, M., Vásquez, A. E. & Keith, D. A. Operationalizing the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems in public policy. Conserv. Lett. 0, e12665 (2019).
Guidance Note 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources (International Finance Corporation, 2019).
Rowland, J. A. et al. Selecting and applying indicators of ecosystem collapse for risk assessments. Conserv. Biol. 32, 1233–1245 (2018).
Venegas-Li, R. et al. An operational methodology to identify critical ecosystem areas to help nations achieve the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Preprint at BioRxiv (2023).
Jones, K. R. et al. Spatial analysis to inform the mitigation hierarchy. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 4, e12686 (2022).
Etter, A., rade, A., Nelson, C. R., Cortés, J. & Saavedra, K. Assessing restoration priorities for high-risk ecosystems: an application of the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. Land Use Policy 99, 104874 (2020).
Valderrábano, M. et al. Using Ecosystem Risk Assessment Science in Ecosystem Restoration: A Guide to Applying the Red List of Ecosystems to Ecosystem Restoration (IUCN, 2021).
Cohen-Shacham, E. et al. Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling nature-based solutions. Environ. Sci. Policy 98, 20–29 (2019).
Bland, L. M. et al. Using multiple lines of evidence to assess the risk of ecosystem collapse. Proc. R. Soc. B (2017).
Obura, D. et al. Vulnerability to collapse of coral reef ecosystems in the Western Indian Ocean. Nat. Sustain. 5, 104–113 (2022).
Burns, E. L. et al. Ecosystem assessment of mountain ash forest in the Central Highlands of Victoria, south-eastern Australia. Austral Ecol. 40, 386–399 (2015).
Xiao, H. et al. Synergies and complementarities between ecosystem risk assessment and ecosystem accounting. Preprint at EcoEvoRxiv (2022).
Mönkkönen, M. et al. More wood but less biodiversity in forests in Finland: a historical evaluation. Memo. Soc. Fauna Flora Fenn. 98, 1–11 (2022).
Kontula, T. & Raunio, A. Threatened Habitat Types in Finland 2018—Red List of Habitats Results and Basis for Assessment (Finnish Environment Institute and Ministry of the Environment, 2019).
Skowno, A. L. & Monyeki, M. S. South Africa’s Red List of Terrestrial Ecosystems (RLEs). Land 10, 1048 (2021).
Brownlie, S. et al. Biodiversity offsets in South Africa—challenges and potential solutions. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 35, 248–256 (2017).
Tremarctos Colombia, Como Sistema de Alertas Tempranas 3.0 (UPME, 2015); http://www.tremarctoscolombia.org/
Norwegian Red List for Ecosystems and Habitat Types 2018 (Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre, 2018).
Skowno, A. L., Jewitt, D. & Slingsby, J. A. Rates and patterns of habitat loss across South Africa’s vegetation biomes. South Afr. J. Sci. (2021).
Hoffmann et al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330, 1503–1509 (2010).
Hoban, S. et al. Genetic diversity targets and indicators in the CBD post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework must be improved. Biol. Conserv. 248, 108654 (2020).
Scherer, M. et al. Sand Dunes System of Southern South America—Assessment Report (IUCN, 2020).
Red List of Baltic Sea Underwater Biotopes, Habitats and Biotope Complexes Baltic Sea Environmental Proceedings No. 138 (Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission—HELCOM, 2013).
Ghana Spatial Biodiversity Assessment v.2 (National Biosafety Authority and the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research,2021).
Uganda Spatial Biodiversity Assessment v.1 (CONNECT Project, 2020).
Mapping Biodiversity Priorities: A Practical, Science-Based Approach to National Biodiversity Assessment and Prioritisation to Inform Strategy and Action Planning (UNEP-WCMC, 2016).
Wilkinson, M. D. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3, 160018 (2016).
Obura, D. O. et al. Achieving a nature- and people-positive future. One Earth 6, 105–117 (2023).
Díaz, S. et al. Set ambitious goals for biodiversity and sustainability. Science 370, 411–413 (2020).
Bachman, S. P. et al. Progress, challenges and opportunities for Red Listing. Biol. Conserv. 234, 45–55 (2019).
Gallagher, R. V. et al. Global shortfalls in threat assessments for endemic flora by country. Plants People Planet 5, 885–898 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10369
Danovaro, R. et al. Ecological variables for developing a global deep-ocean monitoring and conservation strategy. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 181–192 (2020).
Seymour, C. L. et al. Horizon scanning for South African biodiversity: a need for social engagement as well as science. Ambio 49, 1211–1221 (2020).
Han, X. et al. Monitoring national conservation progress with indicators derived from global and national datasets. Biol. Conserv. 213, 325–334 (2017).
Son, H. H. A Welfare-Based Approach to Aggregating Growth Rates Across Countries (SSRN, 2011).
Payet, K. et al. The effect of land cover and ecosystem mapping on ecosystem risk assessment in the Little Karoo, South Africa. Conserv. Biol. 27, 531–541 (2013).
Sievers, M. et al. Indian Sundarbans mangrove forest considered endangered under Red List of Ecosystems, but there is cause for optimism. Biol. Conserv. 251, 108751 (2020).
Pereira, H. M. et al. Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339, 277–278 (2013).
Kim, H. et al. Essential biodiversity variables and essential ecosystem services variables for the implementation of biodiversity conservation and sustainable development goals. Preprint at EcoEvoRxiv (2023).
Schrodt, F. et al. To advance sustainable stewardship, we must document not only biodiversity but geodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16155–16158 (2019).
Bax, N. J. et al. Linking capacity development to GOOS monitoring networks to achieve sustained ocean observation. Front. Mar. Sci. (2018).
Bland, L. M., Keith, D. A., Miller, R. M., Murray, N. J. & Rodríguez, J. P. Guidelines for the application of IUCN Red List of Ecosystems Categories and Criteria, version 1.1 (IUCN, 2017).
Murray, N. J., Keith, D. A., Simpson, D., Wilshire, J. H. & Lucas, R. M. Remap: an online remote sensing application for land cover classification and monitoring. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 2019–2027 (2018).
Lee, C. K., Keith, D. A., Nicholson, E. & Murray, N. J. Redlistr: tools for the IUCN Red Lists of ecosystems and threatened species in R. Ecography 42, 1050–1055 (2019).
Andersen, I. et al. Defining ‘science-based targets’. Nat. Sci. Rev. (2020).
Mair, L. et al. A metric for spatially explicit contributions to science-based species targets. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 836–844 (2021).
Ferrer-Paris, J. R. et al. An ecosystem risk assessment of temperate and tropical forests of the Americas with an outlook on future conservation strategies. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12623 (2019).
Ghoraba, S. M. M., Halmy, M. W. A., Salem, B. B. & Badr, N. B. E. Assessing risk of collapse of Lake Burullus Ramsar site in Egypt using IUCN Red List of Ecosystems. Ecol. Indic. 104, 172–183 (2019).
Lindgaard, A. & Henriksen, S. The 2011 Norwegian Red List for Ecosystems and Habitat Types (Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre, 2011).
Etter, A. et al. Colombian Ecosystems, Threats and Risks. An Application of the Red List of Ecosystems to the Continental Terrestrial Ecosystems (Pontificia Universidad Javeriana and Conservación Internacional-Colombia, 2020).
